Формування економічної культури в українському соціумі

Abstract

Господарська культура України складна і суперечлива. Особливість України полягає в темпоральній відсутності загальнонаціональних соціокультурних ціннісних детермінант і певній історичній невизначеності векторів національного розвитку. З цих позицій у статті розглядається господарська економічна культура України в її історичній ретроспективі, фіксуються особливості, суперечливості і спадкоємність. Особливу увагу приділено діалектиці індивідуального, корпоративного і загальнодержавного рівнів. Economic culture of Ukraine is complex and controversial. Feature Ukraine is temporal absence of national cultural values and certain historical determinants uncertainty vectors of national development. From this perspective, the article is considered the economic Ukraine economic culture in its historical perspective, fixed features, contradictory and continuity. Particular attention is paid to the dialectic of individual, corporate and national levels. Ukrainian economic employment and economic culture because of historical, , ethnic characteristics, forms of government and administration was controversial, and sometimes extreme nature. Ukrainian worker was able to dedicated work in times of crisis history, need external pressure on inspiration and ideological slogans. However, the extreme rise in labor enthusiasm was short-lived and not constant, it changed stagnation once the external incentives to labor intensive disappeared. The formation of the modern socio-economic culture is in conjunction with the development of the global economic socio-cultural environment, creative, intellectual and moral qualities of the individual and of all humanity. Modern economic and socio-economic corporate culture is a complex multifaceted socio-cultural phenomenon, based on the values of "common destiny", professionalism and self-expression, creativity, "complicity" of the individual in modern economic enterprises, corporations and society, determining the existence of any meaning whose economic organization, its attitude towards employees and society. As a conclusion the article states that the new Ukraine is satisfied with economic freedom personal rights, especially the young, the choice of profession and opportunities for professional self-improvement, which in most cases was cruelly locked before the economic dependence of the individual, the need to meet everyday needs through work did not contribute to her creative self in the context of economic activity. The low level of productivity growth and production volumes primarily caused dissatisfaction of most Ukrainian. At the state level need to promote worker such properties as professionalism, competence, interest in the profession, professional capacity integrity, professional skill, creativity and other qualities of personality that are most popular in civilized society.